Wallets cripto · Metodologia de pontuaçãoTested17 MAY 26

Como pontuamos wallets

Cada wallets que avaliamos é pontuado nos mesmos 5 pilares, com os pesos abaixo. A pontuação geral é uma média ponderada, mesma matemática que usamos para cada silo.

Por Skrumble EditorialÚltima revisão May 17, 2026Re-testado every 6 months, sooner after major firmware or app releases

Security

40% peso

Custody model (self / MPC / custodial) and key isolation
Open-source code or vendor audit history
Connectivity attack surface (USB / Bluetooth / air-gapped)
Historical incidents and their resolution

Chain & Asset Support

20% peso

Number of supported chains and tokens
Native asset coverage (BTC, ETH, SOL, plus EVM L2s)
NFT support (where applicable)
dApp / WalletConnect integration breadth

Ease of Use

20% peso

Time to first receive after install
Mobile / desktop / extension UX parity
Companion app polish and update cadence
Recovery flow clarity

Cost

10% peso

Hardware price (for devices)
In-wallet swap fees vs market mid
Free vs paid feature tiers

Trust & Transparency

10% peso

Vendor transparency on incidents
Public audit cadence
Optional services (recovery, custody) — opt-in or default
Privacy posture

— Como testamos —

We buy each hardware wallet at retail, install fresh, and run a fixed test set: receive on three chains (BTC, ETH, SOL), send to a known destination, install one third-party app, and attempt a recovery from seed phrase. For software wallets we install on a fresh device, run the same chain set, and verify dApp connection on three popular sites. Every score reflects the test, not the marketing.

— Como calculamos a pontuação geral —

overall = security * 0.40
          + chain_asset_support * 0.20
          + ease_of_use * 0.20
          + cost * 0.10
          + trust_transparency * 0.10

O resultado é arredondado para uma casa decimal. Usamos uma escala 0-5 porque o olho humano lê "4,2/5" com mais precisão do que "8,4/10" ou "84/100".