Skip to content
Scoring methodRevised17 OCT 26

How we score crypto on-ramps

Skrumble scores every fiat-to-crypto on-ramp from 0 to 5 on five pillars: Cost (35%), Speed (20%), Payment Methods (20%), Country Coverage (15%) and KYC Friction (10%). The overall score is the weighted average, rounded to one decimal. Scores come from the provider's pricing disclosures, terms, help centre and licence registers, all dated. We do not complete purchases through the on-ramps we review.

What are the five pillars of an on-ramp score?

An on-ramp does one job, turning your money into crypto, so what that costs carries the most weight. Speed and payment methods come next because they decide whether a purchase works when you need it. Each pillar gets a score from 0 to 5, set against the evidence in the review's research file and compared with the other on-ramps we cover. There is no points table behind a pillar score. It is a judgement on the documented evidence, made relative to the on-ramps in the table below.

Cost

35% of the score

Everything you pay to turn money into crypto, including costs that never appear in the headline fee.

What the research checks

  • The provider fee by payment method, from its published pricing disclosure for each region
  • The spread built into the quoted price, which some providers do not publish and others publish only as a range
  • Network fees and minimum fees on small purchases
  • Live quotes from the provider's public quote screens or APIs, read without completing a purchase, where they are available

Speed

20% of the score

How long it takes from paying to having the crypto, by payment method.

What the research checks

  • Delivery times the provider states for cards, bank transfers and instant payment rails
  • Holding periods and manual reviews described in the terms

Payment Methods

20% of the score

How many ways you can pay in your country.

What the research checks

  • Cards, bank transfers, instant payment schemes and mobile wallets the provider lists, by region
  • Methods for selling crypto back to money, where offered

Country Coverage

15% of the score

Where the service works, and which licences let it operate there.

What the research checks

  • Supported and restricted countries and US states, from the provider's own lists
  • Licences and registrations on regulators' registers, such as the FCA register in the UK and ESMA's interim MiCA register in the EU

KYC Friction

10% of the score

How much identity checking stands between you and a first purchase.

What the research checks

  • Verification tiers and limits as the provider documents them
  • Documents required and countries where full checks apply from the first purchase
  • The legal floor: EU rules on information that must travel with crypto transfers (Regulation (EU) 2023/1113) mean some friction is required by law, not chosen by the provider

How is an on-ramp's overall score calculated?

Multiply each pillar score by its weight, then add the five results. Here is the arithmetic for MoonPay, using the pillar scores published on its review. Strong coverage and payment options are held back by a low Cost score, which carries the most weight.

MoonPay: Weighted total
PillarScore (0 to 5)WeightContribution
Cost2.635%0.910
Speed4.520%0.900
Payment Methods4.520%0.900
Country Coverage4.715%0.705
KYC Friction3.810%0.380
Weighted total: 3.795. Overall score, rounded to one decimal: 3.8. Read the MoonPay review

What scores do the reviewed on-ramps have?

Every published on-ramp review, ranked by overall score and read from the same data as the review pages. Check the Updated column, because on-ramp pricing changes often. You can also compare costs with the on-ramp cost tool.

What scores do the reviewed on-ramps have?
ReviewOverallCost (35%)Speed (20%)Payment Methods (20%)Country Coverage (15%)KYC Friction (10%)Updated
MoonPay3.82.64.54.54.73.8October 17, 2026
Banxa3.72.64.44.24.64.0October 17, 2026
Ramp Network3.73.24.44.43.43.2October 17, 2026
Transak3.42.74.53.82.63.8October 17, 2026

How the research works

By Skrumble Editorial · Updated

Where does the evidence for an on-ramp score come from?

From the provider's own legal pages and from regulators. Pricing disclosures set the fees, terms of use set holding periods and limits, help-centre pages list countries and payment methods, and registers confirm licences. Court records and regulator notices cover incidents and disputes.

Published figures need careful reading. MoonPay's US pricing disclosure, for example, gives fee ceilings (up to 4.5% on a direct order) and minimum fees rather than a typical cost, and the spread sits inside the quoted price. So the MoonPay review calls those figures maximums and says the spread and network fee come on top.

Other review sites, affiliate blogs and social posts are never evidence. A claim that only appears there does not appear in our review, and company marketing numbers such as user counts are attributed to the company.

How is each on-ramp fact checked before it goes live?

Since October 2026, through four checks, in this order. An on-ramp review that fails any of them does not ship.

  1. Claim ledger. Every factual statement (fees, dates, licences, incidents, user numbers) goes into a table with its current value, the source URL, the publisher, the source's own date and the date we opened it. We cut any claim that has no fetched source.
  2. Adversarial challenge. A separate second pass re-opens the sources for every high-stakes item (money, licences, incidents, lawsuits) plus a random 30% of the rest. Where the two passes disagree, the challenge wins.
  3. Sentence-level QA. On the finished draft, every sentence that states a fact must map to a ledger row or a fetched source. We fix or delete any sentence that does not map.
  4. 100-point audit. The audit scores the finished page out of 100 on content quality, search optimisation, sourcing and expertise signals, technical structure and how easily search and AI tools can cite it. Below 75, the page does not ship. The target is 85.

What does a catch look like?

For the MoonPay review, the first pass found a Florida copyright lawsuit against MoonPay but could not establish its status. The challenge pass pulled the court docket and found the order granting MoonPay summary judgment, dated 13 July 2026, and a notice of appeal filed on 12 August 2026. The review reports both, instead of a case with no known outcome.

All four on-ramp reviews were re-researched on October 17, 2026 under the four-check process set out on this page. The methodology overview explains how the two versions of the process differ.

Do we buy crypto through the on-ramps we review?

No. Skrumble does not create accounts, pass identity checks or complete purchases with the on-ramps it reviews. Every review is desk research; the reviews dated October 2026 list their sources with dates.

That means a score cannot tell you how long your own verification will take or whether your bank will block a card payment. It tells you what the provider publishes about fees, speed, coverage and checks, how that compares across the on-ramps we cover, and what the documents leave unsaid. Where a provider shows live quotes publicly, the research may read them; a quote is a price at one moment, so the review dates it.

How often are on-ramp scores reviewed?

Our target is at least every six months. Each on-ramp review shows the date it was last updated, and the table above repeats it. These events trigger an earlier check:

  • a change to the pricing disclosure or minimum fees
  • a new or withdrawn licence or registration
  • countries or US states added or dropped
  • a lawsuit, ruling or regulator penalty
  • a change of ownership

What happens when an on-ramp review gets something wrong?

Tell us through the contact page, with the claim and the source that contradicts it. We re-open the primary source. If the review is wrong, we correct it, re-check any pillar score the fact feeds, move the review's updated date and record the change and its source in the research file.

A corrected fact does not always move a score, because each pillar is set relative to the other on-ramps we cover. When a score does change, this page's table changes too, since both read the same data.

Do affiliate deals affect on-ramp scores?

No. The overall score is calculated from the five pillar scores and nothing else, so commission terms have no way into it. Today none of the four on-ramp reviews links out with a referral code. The Visit buttons open the providers' own websites.

If a review ever links out through a partner link, Skrumble can earn a commission on your purchase, and the Visit buttons on reviews are marked as sponsored links. No provider approves a review before it is published. The full disclosure is on how we make money.

Frequently asked questions

Why does Cost carry 35% of an on-ramp score?

Because an on-ramp does one thing, and the price of doing it varies a lot between providers and payment methods. In the pricing disclosures we read, card payments carry higher fee ceilings than bank transfers (MoonPay's European disclosure lists card fees of up to 4.5% and bank transfers of up to 1%), and the spread inside a quote can matter as much as the listed fee.

Why do on-ramp reviews give fee ranges instead of one number?

Because providers publish fees by payment method and region, and many publish only ceilings. A single number would be precise but wrong for most readers. The review gives the published range and names the document it comes from.

Is identity checking a bad sign?

No. Licensed providers have to check identity, and EU rules on crypto transfers require certain information to travel with each transfer. KYC Friction scores how much checking a provider asks for and how clearly it explains it, not whether it checks at all.

Did Skrumble test these on-ramps?

No. Skrumble does no hands-on testing. Every on-ramp score comes from dated desk research on pricing disclosures, terms and regulator records.

How can I check an on-ramp score myself?

Take the five pillar scores from the review, multiply each by the weight on this page and add them up. The worked example shows the arithmetic. If your total differs from the published score by more than rounding, tell us.

Sources

  1. [1]United King Film Distribution v. MoonPay USA, order granting summary judgment (Dkt 132) · US District Court, S.D. Florida (via CourtListener) · published · accessed
  2. [2]MoonPay US pricing disclosure · MoonPay USA LLC · accessed
  3. [3]MoonPay Europe pricing disclosure · MoonPay Europe B.V. · accessed
  4. [4]Interim MiCA register of crypto-asset service providers (CSV) · ESMA · accessed
  5. [5]Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 on information accompanying transfers of funds and crypto-assets · EUR-Lex · accessed