Wallets cripto · Metodología de puntajeTested17 MAY 26
Cómo puntuamos wallets
Cada wallets que reseñamos se puntúa con los mismos 5 pilares y los pesos de abajo. El puntaje total es un promedio ponderado, la misma matemática que aplicamos a todos los silos.
Por Skrumble EditorialÚltima revisión Re-probado every 6 months, sooner after major firmware or app releases
Security
40% peso- Custody model (self / MPC / custodial) and key isolation
- Open-source code or vendor audit history
- Connectivity attack surface (USB / Bluetooth / air-gapped)
- Historical incidents and their resolution
Chain & Asset Support
20% peso- Number of supported chains and tokens
- Native asset coverage (BTC, ETH, SOL, plus EVM L2s)
- NFT support (where applicable)
- dApp / WalletConnect integration breadth
Ease of Use
20% peso- Time to first receive after install
- Mobile / desktop / extension UX parity
- Companion app polish and update cadence
- Recovery flow clarity
Cost
10% peso- Hardware price (for devices)
- In-wallet swap fees vs market mid
- Free vs paid feature tiers
Trust & Transparency
10% peso- Vendor transparency on incidents
- Public audit cadence
- Optional services (recovery, custody) — opt-in or default
- Privacy posture
— Cómo probamos —
We buy each hardware wallet at retail, install fresh, and run a fixed test set: receive on three chains (BTC, ETH, SOL), send to a known destination, install one third-party app, and attempt a recovery from seed phrase. For software wallets we install on a fresh device, run the same chain set, and verify dApp connection on three popular sites. Every score reflects the test, not the marketing.
— Cómo se calcula el puntaje total —
overall = security * 0.40
+ chain_asset_support * 0.20
+ ease_of_use * 0.20
+ cost * 0.10
+ trust_transparency * 0.10El resultado se redondea a un decimal. Usamos una escala 0-5 porque el ojo humano lee "4.2/5" con más precisión que "8.4/10" o "84/100".