Skip to content
Wallets cripto · Metodología de puntajeTested17 MAY 26

Cómo puntuamos wallets

Cada wallets que reseñamos se puntúa con los mismos 5 pilares y los pesos de abajo. El puntaje total es un promedio ponderado, la misma matemática que aplicamos a todos los silos.

Security

40% peso
  • Custody model (self / MPC / custodial) and key isolation
  • Open-source code or vendor audit history
  • Connectivity attack surface (USB / Bluetooth / air-gapped)
  • Historical incidents and their resolution

Chain & Asset Support

20% peso
  • Number of supported chains and tokens
  • Native asset coverage (BTC, ETH, SOL, plus EVM L2s)
  • NFT support (where applicable)
  • dApp / WalletConnect integration breadth

Ease of Use

20% peso
  • Time to first receive after install
  • Mobile / desktop / extension UX parity
  • Companion app polish and update cadence
  • Recovery flow clarity

Cost

10% peso
  • Hardware price (for devices)
  • In-wallet swap fees vs market mid
  • Free vs paid feature tiers

Trust & Transparency

10% peso
  • Vendor transparency on incidents
  • Public audit cadence
  • Optional services (recovery, custody) — opt-in or default
  • Privacy posture

— Cómo probamos —

We buy each hardware wallet at retail, install fresh, and run a fixed test set: receive on three chains (BTC, ETH, SOL), send to a known destination, install one third-party app, and attempt a recovery from seed phrase. For software wallets we install on a fresh device, run the same chain set, and verify dApp connection on three popular sites. Every score reflects the test, not the marketing.

— Cómo se calcula el puntaje total —

overall = security * 0.40
          + chain_asset_support * 0.20
          + ease_of_use * 0.20
          + cost * 0.10
          + trust_transparency * 0.10

El resultado se redondea a un decimal. Usamos una escala 0-5 porque el ojo humano lee "4.2/5" con más precisión que "8.4/10" o "84/100".