Transak Review
MetaMask's exclusive on-ramp partner, embedded in 450+ web3 apps
Affiliate link · doesn't affect score · independent methodology
De un vistazo
Transak is a multi-entity embedded on-ramp serving 10M+ users via 450+ wallets and dApps. UK FCA-registered (Transak Limited, 30th globally), with Polish VASP (Transak sp. z o.o.) and Austrian MiCA-prep entity (Transak GmbH). Not yet on the ESMA MiCA CASP register at May 2026: operates EU under the transitional regime that ends 2026-07-01. September 2025: launched as the exclusive provider for MetaMask's in-wallet Deposit button (US + EU) with near-1:1 stablecoin onramping (mUSD, USDC, USDT) and named IBANs. August 2025: $16M strategic round led by Tether and IDG Capital.
MetaMask users buying via the new in-wallet Deposit button (US + EU). Builders embedding on-ramps in 450+ apps. SEPA buyers seeking ~1-1.5% all-in pricing vs 3.5-5.5% via card.
You need full MiCA CASP authorization today (Transak's CASP path is in progress, not finalized). You want Italian-language customer support (Transak supports English primarily via Intercom). You're buying volumes above €5,000 per transaction (tier limits remain modest).
Estadísticas rápidas
- Typical fee ($500)
- 4%
- Payment methods
- card, sepa, apple-pay
- KYC level
- full
- Min purchase
- $30
- Direct to wallet
- Yes
- Countries
- 64+
- Assets
- 136+
Desglose de puntuación Skrumble
Lee nuestra metodología de puntuación completa.
Pros
- MetaMask exclusive provider for in-wallet Deposit button (live US + EU since Sept 2025)
- 136+ cryptocurrencies across 45+ blockchains (broadest chain coverage in segment)
- SEPA ~0.99-1.5% all-in; card 3.5-5.5%
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + SOC 2 Type II security certifications
- 10M+ users; $53M cumulative funding (Tether + IDG Aug 2025)
Cons
- Not yet MiCA CASP-authorized; operates EU under Polish VASP transitional regime ending 2026-07-01
- Card fees 3.5-5.5% are competitive but not best-in-class for SEPA-eligible users
- Italian-language support not confirmed in primary sources
- Country coverage 64+ is materially smaller than the older marketing claim of 155+
- Limits remain modest at base KYC tier